In the event you’ve been paying consideration this previous yr, it appears each app—from Adobe’s Photoshop to Canva—is chasing the white rabbit that’s AI. James Cuda, the CEO of iPad-centric illustration app Procreate, got here out swinging Sunday with a easy assertion: “I actually f*cking hate generative AI.”
In a press release posted to Twitter, Cuda stated, “I don’t like what’s occurring within the business, and I don’t like what it’s doing to artists. We’re not going to be introducing any generative AI into our merchandise.”
We’re by no means going there. Creativity is made, not generated.
You may learn extra at https://t.co/9Fgh460KVu ✨ #procreate #noaiart pic.twitter.com/AnLVPgWzl3— Procreate (@Procreate) August 18, 2024
The corporate’s page about its plans for AI is equally acerbic. It reiterates most of the identical complaints artists, illustrators, graphic designers, and different creatives have had about AI artwork mills.
The biggest AI fashions are constructed on high of billions of scraped pictures from the online, together with the copyrighted work of 1000’s {of professional} and novice artists. Some anti-AI advocates have even steered that artists poison their pictures to disrupt AI coaching.
On its web page, Procreate says, “Generative AI is ripping the humanity out of issues. Constructed on a basis of theft, the know-how is steering us towards a barren future.” Procreate claims it doesn’t have entry to customers’ artwork and doesn’t monitor customers’ exercise.
Artists Throw Their Help Behind Procreate for Anti-AI Arguments
Artists on-line praised Procreate, particularly highlighting Cuda’s blunt phrasing. Idea artist Karla Ortiz wrote, “Now THIS is how an organization for artists helps artists.” Director and artist Jorge Gutierrez wrote, “Procreate 1, Adobe 0.”
Now THIS is how an organization for artists helps artists! By respecting and empowering them, NOT by profiting from them! Good on Procreate for being on the fitting facet of historical past, and searching ahead to regardless of the staff does subsequent 🙌 https://t.co/l7qvHdOPwO
— Karla Ortiz (@kortizart) August 19, 2024
We’ve seen some corporations that appeared initially hesitant and even hostile to AI ultimately come round to extoll its virtues (no matter these could also be). Getty Photos beforehand sued Stable Diffusion makers Stability AI for utilizing the inventory photograph websites’ pictures with out permission. Just a few months later, it introduced its AI image generator onto the platform. The corporate claimed the AI mannequin was constructed solely with pictures the corporate controls.
Getty isn’t alone there. Shutterstock and Adobe Inventory additionally created their very own AI picture mills primarily based on pictures every owns the rights to. The businesses successfully grandfathered in each current creator who shared their work on the inventory picture websites and promised to pay them some more cash for utilizing their pictures for AI.
Adobe Has Taken Warmth for its Firefly AI Mannequin
Artists on-line have in contrast Procreate’s anti-AI message to Adobe, an organization that has virtually drowned its merchandise in AI options. The corporate has pushed Photoshop’s Firefly AI image generator arduous over the previous months, increasing its photograph growth capabilities and entry amongst appropriate platforms. That mannequin is predicated on pictures taken from Adobe Inventory, although a Bloomberg report from April revealed the mannequin additionally incorporates different AI pictures into its coaching set.
Regardless of claims it’s solely utilizing content material it owns, the corporate has been determined to patch up relations with artists. In June, the corporate modified its phrases of service to indicate it’d take customers’ pictures and use them to coach AI. It modified its TOS to make clear it received’t “practice generative AI fashions in your or your prospects’ content material except you’ve submitted the content material to the Adobe Inventory market.”
Final yr, a number of high-profile artists sued big AI companies, together with the makers of Midjourney and Secure Diffusion, alleging the AI corporations stole their copyrighted work with out permission. Final week, the California decide supervising the case, William Orrick, let the case move forward into discovery.
Trending Merchandise
